Ask better poker questions
Give Fisher the context it needs for a useful explanation.
You do not need a perfect prompt. A clear decision, the relevant facts, and the kind of help you want are usually more useful than a long list of instructions.
Include the decision context
For a hand, give positions, effective stack, board, pot, and the action so far. For a training review, specify the period or kind of mistakes you want to investigate. If a detail is unknown, say so.
Separate facts from reads
Explain which information comes from the hand history and which is your interpretation. “The opponent raised” is an observation. “The raise is bluff-heavy” is a hypothesis to test, possibly through nodelocking.
Ask for a useful output
Name what would help you: a reconstruction, a solve setup, a comparison between actions, or a practice priority. When a question is broad, start with one decision and follow up on the explanation.
Use the follow-up
Ask why a nearby hand behaves differently or which assumption drives the result. If an explanation is abstract, request an example. If it is too specific, ask for the general pattern and a counterexample.